top of page
Writer's pictureNeil Degas

Court upholds government's pause on crypto mining power connections: B.C. Hydro emerges victorious.

In a recent court ruling, a cryptocurrency mining company, Conifex Timber Inc., has lost its bid to compel B.C. Hydro to provide the substantial power required for its operations. The decision supports the provincial government's authority to halt power connections for new crypto miners, a move deemed reasonable by Justice Michael Tammen.


The Power Struggle:

Conifex Timber, a forestry firm that diversified into cryptocurrency mining, sought to challenge the government's policy by declaring it invalid. However, Justice Tammen's ruling endorsed the government's decision made in December 2022, which suspended new connections for cryptocurrency mining for a duration of 18 months.


B.C. Hydro CEO Christopher O’Riley testified that Conifex's proposed data centers would have consumed a staggering 2.5 million megawatt-hours of electricity annually. To put this in perspective, it's enough to power and heat over 570,000 apartments, according to data from the power provider's website.


Concerns Raised by B.C. Hydro:

Before the government-imposed pause, B.C. Hydro released a report outlining the challenges posed by cryptocurrency mining operations. The report highlighted that the power demand from these operations could hinder clean energy and electrification goals, particularly as the adoption of electric vehicles and heat pumps increases.


Bitcoin mining, in particular, was singled out as requiring energy equivalent to powering "a small country." The report also drew attention to the increased demand for power in British Columbia due to moratoriums on crypto mining in various regions, including China, Algeria, and certain U.S. states.


The Court's Decision:

Justice Tammen's ruling emphasized that the connection requests from cryptocurrency miners in B.C. over the past few years had far exceeded B.C. Hydro's projections. The government's decision to pause new connections was deemed a response to the genuine concern that allocating such a substantial proportion of the available electrical power supply to one industry could negatively impact other users, potentially leading to increased costs for all residential and industrial customers in B.C.


Company Response and Future Considerations:

In response to the court's decision, Conifex Timber expressed disappointment and is currently contemplating an appeal. The company maintains its belief that the provincial government is missing out on opportunities to enhance energy affordability, promote technological innovation, strengthen power grid reliability, and achieve more inclusive economic growth.


Conclusion:

The court's ruling stands as a testament to the government's authority to regulate power allocations, especially when faced with industries that demand massive amounts of electricity. As the crypto mining landscape continues to evolve, the delicate balance between economic growth and sustainable energy practices remains a crucial consideration for policymakers.

Comments


bottom of page