top of page
Writer's picturePhilip Holland

Holding Apple Accountable: Judge Denies Dismissal in AirTag Stalking Lawsuit.

In a recent development, a judge has made a significant decision regarding a class-action lawsuit against tech giant Apple. The lawsuit alleges that Apple's AirTag devices are being used by stalkers to track individuals without their consent, and that the company hasn't taken adequate measures to prevent such misuse.


The Rise of AirTags and Misuse

Apple's AirTags, priced at $29, have gained popularity since their release in 2021. Designed to help users locate lost items like keys, wallets, and luggage, AirTags have undoubtedly been useful in many scenarios. However, they have also been misused by stalkers to track unsuspecting individuals.


The Class-Action Lawsuit

Dozens of plaintiffs filed a class-action lawsuit against Apple in December 2022, claiming that they were stalked using AirTags and similar tracking devices. They argue that Apple failed to address the dangers associated with these products adequately, thus putting victims at risk. According to the plaintiffs, AirTags have made location-based stalking easier and more widespread than ever before.


Apple's Defense and Judge's Ruling

Apple attempted to dismiss the lawsuit, asserting that they had taken proactive steps to deter misuse and should not be held liable for the actions of third parties. However, San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria denied Apple's motion to dismiss the case. While some claims were dismissed, three claims regarding negligence and strict product liability under California law were allowed to proceed.


Victims' Stories Highlight the Issue

The ruling highlighted accounts from victims who were stalked using AirTags, resulting in emotional and financial harm. These cases emphasized purported defects in AirTags, such as unclear notifications and an inability to disable the devices remotely, which prolonged the stalking incidents.


Continuing the Fight for Justice

Attorneys representing the plaintiffs expressed gratitude for the opportunity to continue the litigation, emphasizing the importance of holding accountable those who engage in abusive and dangerous location tracking. They stressed the need for accountability and change in addressing this growing concern.


Apple's Response and Collaborative Efforts

Apple, as well as attorneys representing the company, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. However, Apple had previously condemned any malicious use of its products and announced plans for updates aimed at increasing safety. Additionally, Apple partnered with Google to propose standards for combating secret surveillance on AirTags and similar devices.


Conclusion

The denial of Apple's motion to dismiss the class-action lawsuit marks a significant development in the ongoing debate surrounding the use and misuse of AirTags. As the case moves forward, it underscores the importance of addressing privacy and safety concerns associated with tracking devices. It also highlights the necessity of holding companies accountable for the potential harm caused by their products.

Comments


bottom of page