top of page
Writer's pictureNathan Kurtin

OpenAI Introduces New Privacy Controls for ChatGPT Users

Updated: Aug 12, 2023

OpenAI, the AI research laboratory famous for its language models, has introduced new privacy controls for ChatGPT users, allowing them to turn off their chat history. The move comes amid concerns over privacy and data protection, particularly in the context of sensitive conversations and personal information being used to train AI models.

According to a blog post by OpenAI, conversations that take place while chat history is disabled will not be used to train the company's models or appear in the "history" sidebar. This means that users can now have more control over their data and conversations and ensure that their personal information is not being used without their consent.

OpenAI has also confirmed that it will keep the new conversations for 30 days, but it will only review them if it is necessary to monitor for abuse. This means that OpenAI will be able to keep track of conversations in case there are any issues, but will only access them if there is a legitimate reason to do so. The new privacy controls introduced by OpenAI are a significant step forward in protecting user privacy and data protection. They give users more control over their data and conversations, ensuring that their personal information is not being used without their consent.

In the context of legal proceedings, the new privacy controls may have significant implications. For example, if a conversation takes place in ChatGPT that is relevant to a legal case, the conversation may be subject to legal discovery. However, if the chat history is disabled, the conversation may not be admissible as evidence, as it cannot be used to train OpenAI's models or appear in the "history" sidebar.

Overall, the new privacy controls introduced by OpenAI are a positive development for user privacy and data protection. They give users more control over their data and conversations and ensure that their personal information is not being used without their consent. In the legal context, they may also have significant implications for admissibility of evidence and discovery.


Comments


bottom of page